Field Seminar B, 2009-2010, PhD
The Field Seminar B course handout is available here, although we are still working out the content and some of the topics for later sessions.
The first four weeks look like this:
Week 1: (2 Oct 2009): Ken Benoit " Measuring Policy Positions through Text I
Week 2: (9 Oct) Ken Benoit " Measuring Policy Positions through Text II
Week 3: (16 Oct) Gail McElroy " Legislative Organization: Party Influence
Week 4: (23 Oct) Gail McElroy " Legislative Organization and Behaviour: Beyond Congress
The detailed reading list for these first four weeks is:
Week 1: Measuring Policy Positions through Text I (Kenneth Benoit)
Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara & Eric Tanenbaum. 2001. Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945"1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Especially Introduction, Chapters 1-4, Appendix II.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara, Ian Budge & Michael McDonald. 2006. Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990-2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Especially Introduction, Chapters 4-6.
Kenneth Benoit, Slava Mikhaylov, and Michael Laver. 2009. “ Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions.” American Journal of Political Science 53(2, April): 495-513.
Exercise:
- You must read the manifesto coding instructions, found here (from Appendix II of MMP1 and MMP2).
- Code the test manifesto from this document (Appendix II) as an exercise, but only the sections headed WE WILL GROW, PROSPER and ALLIANCES.
Recommended:
Volkens, Andrea. 2001a. Manifesto Research Since 1979. From Reliability to Validity. In Estimating the Policy Positions of Political Actors, ed. Michael Laver. London: Routledge pp. 33"49. ** **
Week 2: Measuring Policy Positions through Text II (Kenneth Benoit)
Jonathan B. Slapin and Sven-Oliver Proksch. 2008. “A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts”, American Journal of Political Science 52(3), 705-722.
Recommended:
See also: http://wordscores.com
Week 3: Legislative Organization: Party Influence (GM)
Gary Cox and Mathew McCubbins. 2005. Setting the Agenda. Cambridge: CUP. Part I, Chapters 3,4,7,10&11.
Keith Krehbiel. 1993. “Where’s the Party?"British Journal of Political Science. 23: 235-266
Lawrence ED, Maltzman F, Smith SS. 2006. Who wins? Party effects in legislative voting _Legislative Studies Quarterly _31 (1) : 33-69
Aldrich, John H. and David W. Rohde. 2001. “The Logic of Conditional Party Government: Revisiting the Electoral Connection.” In Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer (eds.), Congress Reconsidered 7th ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press: 269-292.
Suggested Reading:
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Edward H. Stiglitz and Barry R. Weingast, 2009, “Agenda Control in Congress: Evidence from Cutpoint Estimates and Ideal Point Uncertainty.” Manuscript. Available at http://polisci.stanford.edu/faculty/weingast/
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Week 4: Legislative Organization and Behaviour: Beyond Congress (GM)
Simon Hix, Abdul G. Noury and Gérard Roland. Democratic politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007.
McElroy, Gail and Kenneth Benoit. 2009. “Party Policy and Group Affiliation in the European Parliament.” . Forthcoming BJPS .
Yoshinaka, Antoine, Gail McElroy and Shaun Bowler. Manuscript. Rapporteurs in the European Parliament: Partisans or Honest Brokers?
Stephen A. Meserve , Daniel Pemstein and William T. Bernhard. 2009. Political Ambition and Legislative Behavior in the European Parliament.The Journal of Politics, Vol. 71(3): 1015"1032
Suggested Reading:
McElroy, Gail. 2007. “Legislative Politics as Normal?: Voting Behaviour and Beyond in the European Parliament”. European Union Politics